Expansion of Flock Automated License Plate Reader Cameras
Town of Cheektowaga
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 24, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Argued against Flock cameras, citing studies showing they do not reduce crime, plate misread errors, and privacy risks regarding out-of-state law enforcement access.
Board - Regular Meeting — June 24, 2026 · 16:31 →Expressed opposition to Flock and suggested alternative ALPR systems with better privacy features, on-premise computing, and proper oversight policies.
Board - Regular Meeting — June 24, 2026 · 19:24 →Argued against Flock cameras as an attorney representing indigent defendants, citing Fourth Amendment protections and lack of meaningful audit accountability.
Board - Regular Meeting — June 24, 2026 · 21:30 →Expressed concern about insufficient guardrails and data protection in the Flock system despite acknowledging potential investigative usefulness.
Board - Regular Meeting — June 24, 2026 · 1:32:03 →Strongly supported the police department and Flock cameras, asserting that criminals view Cheektowaga as soft and urging a roll-call vote.
Board - Regular Meeting — June 24, 2026 · 27:50 →Called for cutting ties with Flock, creating a civilian review board, and citing mass surveillance concerns and data-sharing scope.
Board - Regular Meeting — June 24, 2026 · 31:36 →Former Cheektowaga Police Chief supported Flock cameras as a proven investigative tool that helps locate missing children and solve crimes.
Board - Regular Meeting — June 24, 2026 · 36:00 →Expressed strong support for expanding Flock cameras to enhance family safety and combat crime in the town.
Board - Regular Meeting — June 24, 2026 · 39:16 →Questioned Flock's effectiveness compared to basic environmental improvements like lighting and noted unapproved traffic infraction searches in logs.
Board - Regular Meeting — June 24, 2026 · 43:39 →