Automated License Plate Recognition (Flock Cameras)
Town of Cheektowaga
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 26, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Expressed strong opposition to Flock cameras, citing FBI plans to purchase nationwide ALPR access and potential liability lawsuits faced by other municipalities.
Board - Regular Meeting — May 26, 2026 · 5:19 →An Amherst resident who commutes through Cheektowaga warned about ALPR data hacking risks and urged the town to avoid signing contracts with vendors lacking strong privacy safeguards.
Board - Regular Meeting — May 26, 2026 · 9:04 →Questioned why the town is expanding Flock cameras without answering prior citizen concerns, noted FOIL discrepancies regarding data ownership, and reiterated support for the New York Health Act.
Board - Regular Meeting — May 26, 2026 · 12:39 →Voiced opposition to Flock camera expansion due to transparency portal discrepancies, biased camera placement in non-white neighborhoods, and lack of crime reduction evidence.
Board - Regular Meeting — May 26, 2026 · 16:17 →Questioned contract cost details for additional Flock cameras, noted liability concerns prompting other cities to cancel contracts, and urged an immediate vote on the New York Health Act resolution.
Board - Regular Meeting — May 26, 2026 · 27:18 →During the second public comment period, reviewed Lexipol police policy language regarding ALPR usage, vague purging standards, and advanced technological features like vehicle fingerprinting.
Board - Regular Meeting — May 26, 2026 · 1:39:34 →Contrasted voluntary personal technology use with mandatory road surveillance, criticized using technology to offset police staffing shortages, and raised equity concerns over neighborhood surveillance.
Board - Regular Meeting — May 26, 2026 · 1:43:42 →